In recent past, there has been an article published in Los Angeles Times that states Uber could possibly be penalized $7. 3m and banned from operating its business in California because of its failure to give the regulators sufficient information about its service along with operations. Karen V Clopton, a judge at the California Public Utilities Commission – the regulator who permits Uber to operate their business in the state – recommended the punishment, arguing that this gradually beleaguered firm hadn’t filed all the reports obligatory by state laws. The judge administrated that Uber’s months-long refusal to give important data was in violation of the particular 2013 legislation that authorized ride-hailing companies to operate in the State. The requested data comprises details number of the requests for trips from publics with wheelchairs in addition to how many such rides were done.
We went to seek out a Hamilton Disability Lawyer to get more information on this injunction.
In response to that, the worldwide taxi-hailing giant Uber stated it would appeal against the penalty. A spokeswoman said the decision is “deeply disappointing”. The appeals procedure will take several months to decide whether the charge as well as the suspension, will be enforced or not. Besides, Marilyn Golden, senior policy analyst at the Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund in Berkeley was also applauded by the judge’s decision. “This industry has done everything it can to avoid, dismiss and coerce themselves out of regulation, and this decision is welcome from that standpoint,” she said. “They’ve been scofflaws. They take every advantage and avoid every requirement.”
All over the world this taxi-sharing, drivers, and taxi unions are recently plagued by a number of threats from regulators. If the organization is ceased in its own terrace, it will be a symbolical and discouraging blow because it goes to handle with push back from taxi operators in lots of the 300+ cities as well as around six continents in which it operates.
At the same time, a legal bid to force Uber to deal with the drivers as employees instead of freelancers could greatly inflate the firm’s charges. If the drivers have been treated as employees, the corporation could be enforced to provide verities of incentives containing health insurance and repayments for fuel and other costs.
The Long and legal resistance again Uber
- Germany: Administrators just slapped a countrywide ban on Uber because the drivers don’t have a particular license as well as they will be fined up to $323,700 per trip if Uber disrupts this momentary injunction.
- Spain: In June thousands of taxi drivers went for a strike, because of the unregulated cab service that was taking their industry.
- India: “According to the Economic Times, three Uber competitors — Meru Cabs, Easy Cab, and Mega Cab — have written to the Reserve Bank of India, complaining that Uber is violating foreign-exchange laws.”
- Brazil: If the government of Sao Paulo pushes for the suspension of the Uber’s service they could possibly face huge legal difficulties. For illustration, a few weeks ago “three cars were found providing services through Uber in Sao Paulo and the drivers had to pay fines of $900 on average.”
- Vancouver: The city attorney claims that the service is illegal: “Though the meter UberX uses does not look like a traditional taxi meter that measures time and distance as the ride progresses, it still fits within the definition of (a) taxi meter [under city code].”
- United States: The cab unions are putting massive pressure on local governments to ban Uber in their cities. In Milwaukee, five taxi groups are “suing the city of Milwaukee, hoping to block an ordinance that provides a path to legalization for mobile ride-booking apps.” In California, New York, and DC, Uber has confronted several cease-and-desist guidelines.
Uber had tried for getting approval some sort of service that uses GPS and mobile phone technology to offer low-end luxury vehicle transportation, something that no one is providing. But, unfortunately, the license for such kind of service doesn’t exist yet because the commission simply offers ones for taxis along with limos. So the authority will have to make a new license if they want to give it Uber. But currently, the person who is in control of stuff like licenses is assuring to penalize Uber simply because it does not own it.